
Puerto Ricans Are Among the Most Worried About Climate Change
Residents of Puerto Rico are among the most worried in the world about climate change according to a new study by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication (YPCCC).
The study, conducted in partnership with Rare and Data for Good at Meta, found that 93% of Puerto Ricans said they are “very worried” or “somewhat worried” about climate change; 84% said climate change will harm future generations “a great deal”; and 61% said climate change will harm them personally “a great deal.” Puerto Rico also had the highest number of respondents in the world who believe that climate change should be a high government priority.
"This says that the population seems highly attuned to climate change, potentially because of their exposure and experiences with extreme weather that have accumulated over the decades,” said Marija Verner, a postdoctoral associate at the Yale School of the Environment. “The second takeaway is that personal experience matters in how people approach these issues, and the third is really underscoring community resilience. Puerto Rico has built pretty strong adaptive capacity and strong support networks.”
The report, “International Public Opinion on Climate Change: 2023,” describes climate change beliefs, attitudes, policy preferences, and behaviors among Facebook users in 100 countries, territories, and geographic groups representing 187 countries and territories worldwide. It is one of a series of reports that YPCC has been conducting across the world in order to understand climate change attitudes, fears and behaviors. The survey was conducted by Meta from August 3 – September 3, 2023. Researchers at YPCCC are using the survey data to release findings related to public views on the links between climate change and extreme weather in the Global South and adoption of, and barriers to, behaviors that can reduce personal and household carbon dioxide emissions in the Global North.
More News in Brief
Study Explores Climate Friendly Alternatives to Reducing Wildfire Risks
To prevent destructive wildfires, the U.S. Forest Service thins forests and places the cuttings, called residue, into piles for burning. However, a recent study led by Jake Barker ’24 MF and a team of researchers projected that a significant amount of carbon dioxide is released during these events, which works against climate-change mitigation goals. The burns are also financially costly.
The residue burns by the Forest Service are being used to prevent catastrophic fires that have been fueled by logging, drought, climate-change, and previous government-mandated fire suppression that have led to the accumulation of debris and dense stands of small trees, which provide fuel for enormous blazes.
The study, published in Frontiers for Global Change, simulated residue burning across western U.S. forests, and estimated that the burns contributed over 1.7 million metric tons of carbon emissions annually. The researchers found that that costs for labor and equipment were also notably higher than had been reported.
The authors suggest that alternatives to burning residues, such as using them for biofuels or burying them to sequester carbon, could help reduce fire risk and carbon emissions. Steep forest terrain makes removing residues for other uses difficult and costly. They recommend the Forest Service seek subsidies to aid in funding infrastructure for climate-friendly alternatives.
“Forests play a big part in natural climate solutions,” Barker said. “We’re demonstrating the opportunity for novel and creative pathways to transform residues into a natural climate solution.”

Forest worker observing a controlled burn. Photo: iStock/AscentXmedia
YSE Students Win Questrom School of Business Sustainability Competition
A five-member team of students from the Yale School of the Environment and Yale School of Management won first place at the Boston Questrom School of Business Sustainability Case Competition for developing ideas to boost a solar company’s B Corp score.
“We worked hard over the course of two months to come up with solutions to real problems for real companies,” said team member Shivansh Chaturvedi ’26 MF/MBA.
The group earned the $50,000 prize during the third annual competition, besting more than 90 other teams in the country’s largest sustainability-focused case competition.
In the finals, the team focused on how New England-based ReVision Energy could boost its B Corp score, which measures firms’ social and environmental impact. The team calculated that ReVision could attract more female electricians by offering in-house childcare, which would save money by reducing employee turnover. The team also proposed carbon removal investments to neutralize ReVision’s environmental impact.
Chaturvedi said YSE’s interdisciplinary education helped the team clinch the win.
“We felt very confident going into that competition, knowing that we had a holistic understanding of the problem from various lenses,” he said.
Team members included Gabriel Gadsden ’26 PhD, Henry Ritter ’25 MEM/MBA, and Yale School of Management students Arjun Kumar ’25 MBA and Leigh Ramsey ’25 MBA.
Two local charities benefited, too. The competition required that the winners donate 10% of the prize to charity. The Yale team picked Save the Sound and Common Ground.

Study Finds Destruction of Ivory Does Not Reduce Elephant Poaching Rates
The world’s elephant population has declined by half since 1979, with just about 460,000 elephants remaining — down from ten million a century ago. In an effort to curtail the death of elephants caused by ivory poaching, about 300 tons of ivory has been destroyed since 1989. Kenya organized the first public burn of stockpiled ivory in 1989, to raise awareness and deter the trade of ivory and elephant poaching, but does destroying ivory helped or hurt efforts to protect elephants?
A study led by Emma Gjerdseth, a postdoctoral researcher at the Yale School of the Environment, examined the causal effects of ivory destruction on elephant poaching rates in Africa and Asian countries. The paper, published in the journal World Development, is the first to examine the impact of ivory destruction. It found that in African countries, ivory destruction increases poaching rates with large spillover effects across the continent. In Asia, there is no evidence that elephant poaching rates respond to ivory destruction.
“The destruction of ivory is not saving elephants in the wild,” Gjerdseth said. “While poaching incentives in the country with a destruction event are unchanged because the price effect is offset by enforcement and publicity, it leads to more elephant deaths across the continent. This can create perverse incentives for countries acting on their own to participate symbolically while other countries on the continent incur negative externalities from displaced poaching activity.”
The study found that a destruction event in Africa increases poaching rates by 18% across sites.
“This research suggests that proper management of confiscated illicit materials should not involve destruction,” Gjerdseth said. “It also highlights the importance of accounting for economic incentives in wildlife conservation strategies and policies.”
