Publication

Framing Peak Petroleum as a Public Health Problem: Audience Research and Participatory Engagement in the United States

Anthony Leiserowitz and 2 other contributors

On This Page

    Abstract

    Between December 2009 and January 2010, we conducted a nationally representative telephone survey of US adults (n=1001; completion rate=52.9%) to explore perceptions of risks associated with peak petroleum. We asked respondents to assess the likelihood that oil prices would triple over the next 5 years and then to estimate the economic and health consequences of that event. Nearly half (48%) indicated that oil prices were likely to triple, causing harm to human health; an additional 16% said dramatic price increases were unlikely but would harm health if they did occur. A large minority (44%) said sharp increases in oil prices would be "very harmful" to health. Respondents who self-identified as very conservative and those who were strongly dismissive of climate change were the respondents most likely to perceive very harmful health consequences. (Am J Public Health. 2011;101:1620-1626. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300230)