Publication

Three ground datasets were used to simulate the canopy height characteristics of tropical forests in Costa Rica for the purposes of forest biomass estimation. The canopy height models (CHMs) were used in conjunction with airborne laser data. Gross biomass estimation errors on the order of 50-90% arose in two of the three analyses. The characteristics of the datasets and the biomass estimation procedure are reviewed to identify sources of error. In one dataset, the width of the fixed-area ground plots were small enough (5m) that significant portions of the overstory canopy above the plots were not accounted for in the ground samples. The use of mapped stand data from thin ground plots resulted in inaccurate CHMs, which in turn lead to gross overestimates of forest biomass (about 90% larger than the ground reference value). CHMs generated using mensuration data collected on thin, fixed-area plots may significantly underestimate the average canopy height and crown closure actually found on that plot. This underestimation problem is directly related to plot width. Below a critical threshold, the thinner the plot, the greater the underestimation bias. In the second dataset, it is believed that lower-than-normal rainfalls at the beginning and end of the wet season may have produced a forest canopy with reduced leaf area. The airborne laser pulses penetrated further into the canopy, resulting in airborne laser estimates of forest biomass which grossly underestimated reference values by about 50%. Changing canopy conditions (e.g. leaf loss due to drought, insect defoliation, storm damage) can affect the accuracy of a CHM. Sources of error are reported in order to forewarn those researchers who produce and utilize canopy height models.