Overview

Identify and execute feasible, high-level actions that could modify the financial and reward structures within academia most responsible for inhibiting: a) interdisciplinary and problem oriented research on large-scale, urgent issues like climate change; and b) faculty and PhD student engagement in public communication, policy-making and other public service arenas. Recruit key influencers to meet with university presidents, university funders, and other influencers in furtherance of this objective.

Recent posts | Participants | Objectives| Related Initiatives

Recent posts

    Objectives

    • Exert pressure to change incentive structures. These incentives have a profound influence on constraining interdisciplinary research as well as public outreach by scientists. While it is generally accepted that it is difficult to change academic institutions, the significance of the stakes makes high-level entreaties to accomplish changes worthwhile.
    • Enlist university presidents. Attempts should therefore be made to enlist university presidents, perhaps through their associations and journals, and other informal peer-to-peer dialogues, to conduct significant re-evaluations of how their institutions discourage outreach at present, and how this could be changed. Some also look to foundations and other funders to expand the nascent outreach components required for research grants.
    • Leverage foundation support. Foundations and other philanthropic organizations are widely recognized as vital funders of the university enterprise. As such, they could exercise considerable influence in driving changes in incentive structures, both directly by reaching out to key university officials and by attaching requirements to their grants requiring, for example, significant public communication and outreach work by the grantees. They could similarly put a greater priority on funding the kind of interdisciplinary research that is so critical to climate change science.
    • Reduce risks to faculty. Identify ways to reduce or eliminate career penalties and risks to university faculty and other researchers from communicating their work.
      • Protect them from overt intimidation by those who would prefer that they refrain from informing contentious debates with research findings.
      • Also seek to counter the “gotcha” risk that breeds norms of excessive caution in scientific academia; some feel that the risks of being caught in a small mistake are typically exaggerated in relation to the importance of getting the general principles right.

    Related Initiatives

    Get involved in this action.