In examining the best strategy to set forth in creating a “New Vision for Energy”, we would be remiss in not taking a close look at the corporate sector’s efforts to construct an agenda regarding climate change.
In acknowledging the need to address climate change BP, Chevron and ExxonMobil have set forth several initiatives and partnerships. All parties indicate their interest in lowering their carbon dioxide emissions with varying strategies as to how to accomplish this end. BP is dedicated to research conducted by Princeton University evaluating potential options for transforming energy use using existing technologies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Princeton and BP are joined in this effort with Ford Motor Company to support the Carbon Mitigation Initiative. An additional partnership has been established with Stanford University, where BP has sponsored $2 million for a three year research program that will evaluate the modern energy markets public policy facets. Chevron’s involvement with the CO2 Capture Project is an initiative with eight major energy companies, the Department of Energy, European Union and Klimatek. Finally, ExxonMobil has invested $100 million in the Global Climate and Energy Project, also led by Stanford University, charged with researching commercially viable energy supply technologies that will lower greenhouse gas emissions. An awareness of these initiatives and partnerships is integral in providing constructive insight as to how other sectors should move forward in executing their climate change strategies.



2 comments
April 20th, 2006 at 1:26 pm
Richard
No one is more delighted than me when unexpected parties sit down at the table with people committed to substantial climate change action. The steps towards engagement from certain evangelical Christian sectors, for example, has been to me as unexpected as it is encouraging.
But when the New York Times - hardly an anti-corporate shill - finds enough evidence to call a firm “an enemy of the planet”, as Paul Krugman called ExxonMobil in an April 17, 2006 editorial, it would be remiss to overlook the large body of consistent and well-documented actions that prompted such an accusation.
February 18th, 2008 at 12:25 am
Web Developer
I agree with Richard, because it is always good to see different parties sitting down together to find a common and “better” solution. In the meantime, I would like to know more about the “Carbon Fund” and how it could be usefull with the economies like ours (I am from Sri Lanka.)
Thank you